新加坡六合彩投注

Fur trapping: What's the Issue?

Here's what you need to know about the industry

Each year, millions of wild animals鈥痑re鈥痗aught鈥痑nd killed for their fur using鈥痺ire鈥痵nares鈥痑nd鈥痓ody gripping, foothold, and leghold traps.鈥疉nimals commonly trapped in the wild include coyotes, bobcats, lynxes, foxes, beavers, raccoons, muskrats, and martens.鈥疶raps injure and kill countless numbers of 鈥渘on-targeted鈥 animals too, which trappers refer to as 鈥渢rash.鈥 These victims are鈥痙ogs and cats, mountain lions, deer, birds, and other animals鈥攊ncluding threatened and endangered animals.鈥

North America鈥(namely鈥痶he鈥疷.S. and Canada)鈥痶ake the lead, followed by Russia,鈥痜or the largest number of wild animals killed for the鈥痜ur鈥痶rade, with around half of all fur鈥痯elts鈥減roduced鈥濃痠n North America鈥痶aken from wild animals.鈥疘n the U.S. trapping鈥痶akes place鈥痮n private and public lands, including protected lands and recreational areas.鈥

Although animals trapped in the wild account for roughly 5% of furs used in the global fur trade, the methods used to鈥痗atch and kill them are鈥痟orrific and brutal.鈥疻ire noose鈥痵nares can鈥痗rush organs or鈥痵lowly strangle鈥痑n animal鈥痶o death.鈥疊ody gripping traps can trap animals underwater until they slowly drown.鈥疉nimals caught in leghold traps try鈥痶o chew or twist off their鈥痶rapped limb in a desperate attempt to free themselves.鈥

More than 100鈥痗ountries have banned the use of leghold traps鈥痙ue to the extreme suffering and pain they cause to animals.鈥疘n the U.S., however, leghold traps are still one of the most commonly used traps by commercial and recreational fur trappers.鈥

Stuck in traps, animals can die of exhaustion, exposure, predation, starvation, dehydration, shock, drowning, injury or blood loss. Animals that manage to stay alive until being found are often brutally killed through drowning, suffocation, beatings or have their chest crushed by a foot or knee. 

Laws and Regulations鈥

In the U.S.,鈥痶he number of wild animals trapped for their fur is鈥痯oorly鈥痳egulated and鈥痮ften managed without proper regard to animal welfare or population numbers. In 2015, over 65,000 wild bobcats were killed and exported outside the U.S.鈥 this is a dramatic increase from a little over 16,000 killed in 2011.鈥疘n Canada, over 800,000 wild animal skins were available for sale鈥痠n 2015; this included over 100,00 coyotes鈥痺ho were鈥痥illed for their increased鈥痷se in fur-trimmed coats and other winter wear.鈥

Like fur farms, which fall under the jurisdiction of individual state agricultural departments, trapping is largely governed by the states. This results鈥痠n vast discrepancies鈥痠n laws and regulations among鈥痶he different states. While some like California, Colorado,鈥疕awaii,鈥痑nd Washington have humane regulations in place regarding trapping,鈥痑 majority of鈥痵tates鈥痙on鈥檛,鈥痑nd their weak regulations allow trappers to鈥痵imply鈥痳egulate themselves.鈥疧nly 13 states require trappers to report how many animals they kill. 

Poor regulations and lack of鈥痳equired鈥痳eporting is also a cause of concern for鈥痵ensitive species that are鈥痑lready鈥痶hreatened or at risk due to鈥痩ow鈥痯opulation numbers. Depending on their economic value, population鈥痭umbers of sensitive species in certain states are often inflated to allow for more trapping, putting animals like bobcats, river otters, wolverines, lynxes, fishers, martens,鈥痥it foxes, and even bears at greater risk鈥痮f extinction.鈥

Undercover investigations鈥痟ave shown that the鈥痯ractice of letting the industry regulate itself, as often seen with farm animals and factory farming, leads to uncontrolled鈥痑nd perpetual鈥痗ruelty. This includes鈥痶rappers鈥痓latantly ignoring鈥痳ules, use of illegal traps鈥痮r snares, cruel killing methods, disregard of timeframes for checking traps 鈥 leaving many animals in agony for days鈥 underreporting the number鈥痮f animals and species killed,鈥痶rapping animals during non-hunting season, and鈥痜ailing to鈥痳eport鈥痶he number of non-target animals killed. All of this makes鈥痶he鈥痩ikelihood of鈥痶he total number of鈥痑nimals reported, both targeted and non-targeted,鈥痩ikely far below the actual number of animals killed.鈥

Fur Free Fashion鈥

The safest and most compassionate choice鈥痑 consumer can make鈥痠s to avoid fur completely and鈥痶o鈥痵upport fashion brands that have taken a stand to no longer support the cruel industry. Brands that support not using fur include鈥疓ucci, Hugo Boss, Armani, and the VF鈥疌orporation, which owns鈥痭early 30 fashion brands such as The North Face, Vans, Timberland, Lee, and Dickies.鈥疌onsumers also support these changes. For instance, in鈥痑 2017 survey of Massachusetts residents, 64% supported a state-wide ban on the sale of clothing that contained animal fur.鈥

It's time to #

Share now!

Search